| |
Obama Bought Puerto Ricans but without Mexican Americans, Obama
can Not Win Re-Election
SANTA FE, NM (By
Jon Garrido, The Jon Garrido Network) June
17, 2011
―
On March 23, 2010, the Affordable
Care Act became law.
To become law, the Affordable
Care Act required 216 votes in the House of
Representatives.
The decision to have the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus
vote "yes" on
Health Care Reform knocked down a huge roadblock
in reaching
the necessary 216
votes for final passage.
The
Congressional Hispanic Caucus traded their votes not for Immigration Reform
which is the number one issue for America's Hispanics but for
Puerto Rico's residents to receive $1
billion
to have access to a state insurance
exchange and
$6.3 billion
for Medicaid spending in Puerto Rico for
a total of $7.3 billion.
In addition, whereas the Senate bill
strictly limited how new Medicaid
funding could be spent, the
reconciliation bill gave Puerto Rico
flexibility to determine how best to use
this funding to expand coverage and
improve services.
There was no path to
216 votes without
the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus
(CHC) on
board.
This votes from the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus came
from the former chairwoman of the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus,
Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez, a
Puerto Rican American politician.
The
priority requirement for the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus was to care
for the needs of Puerto Ricans
―
not
Immigration Reform, the number one issue
across the United States for Mexican Americans
and for those from Central and South
America who have to adhere to the same
requirements for entrance into the
United States as do Mexicans.
Puerto Ricans do
not consider
Immigration Reform a
high priority
because Puerto Ricans
can come and go to Puerto Rico without
hindrance.
The Obama White
House knew what buttons to push and they
played
Velázquez for delivery of the Hispanic
Caucus votes by offering $7.3 Billion to Puerto Rico.
Not all Puerto Ricans are as selfish as
Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez.
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) who is also a Puerto Rican rates
Immigration Reform as the highest
priority in the USA.
Gutierrez
said, "It's scandalous
Congress has done nothing on immigration
and President Obama has made things
worse."
Representative
Gutierrez
further
said, "This administration of Barack
Obama will exceed the number of family
separations and deportations than even
at the height of George Bush, which is
saying a lot. Understand the fear and
the devastation that are going on. You
know, it needs to get taken care of.
It's the plight of some 12 million
undocumented immigrants that is the
highest priority for America's Hispanics."
Health Care Reform Left Out
Undocumented
The CHC vote
for Health Care Reform was ever so
transparent to most USA Hispanics.
None said it better than the National Council of La Raza
who
stood firm against the bill because
of the immigration language.
"The argument
everyone should support healthcare
reform because it's for the 'greater
good' has given national leaders an
excuse to brush off the concerns of
the most disenfranchised and
vulnerable communities that
desperately need results," said
Jennifer Ng'andu, deputy director of
La Raza's Health Policy Project.
"More often than not, appeals to the
"greater good" come at the expense
of the most vulnerable communities."
$7.3 Billion in Lieu of
Immigration Reform Killed any Success
for Immigration Reform in 2010,
2011 and 2012
Nydia Velazquez obviously indifferent to
Immigration Reform was bribed by the
White House for her vote and for her to
deliver the vote of
the Congressional Hispanic Caucus to
approve Health Care Reform.
Velazquez eagerly accepting the
$7.3 billion for health care for Puerto Ricans.
Accepting the bribe, Velazquez effectively killed Immigration
Reform in 2010, 2011 or 2012.
Tit for tat
President Obama’s visit to Puerto Rico, the first official state visit by a
president in five decades, has been widely recognized as an attempt to reach out
to Hispanic voters in the United States, where winning the Hispanic vote is a key part of Obama’s
re-election strategy.
Nydia Velazquez paved the way for Obama
to visit Puerto Rico and reminded Puerto Ricans it was Obama who delivered $7.3
Billion for Puerto Rico's health care programs.
Even if all
Puerto Ricans in the United States vote for President Obama's re-election, it
will not be enough to compensate for the loss of the Mexican American vote for
failure to deliver Immigration Reform and to use deportation of non-criminals to
appease Independents and Republicans.
President Obama’s trip to Texas,
where he gave a
speech on the
need for
immigration
reform was
crafted for
maximum
political
advantage.
The point was to
remind Hispanics
the president
supports a path
to legality and
citizenship for
undocumented and
Republicans do
not. If the
president
proposes another
go at
immigration
reform and is
turned down by
Congress, part
of which is now
controlled by
the GOP, that
should ensure
maximum loyalty
for Obama’s
reelection bid
on the part of
most Hispanics.
In Obama's
world, it ought
to work but it
doesn't.
Hispanics are
not buying what
Obama is
selling.
The blatant
insincerity of
Obama's gambit
is turning off
intended
voters of his
appeal.
Mexican American Hispanics
understand the
president is
merely playing
us.
First, if
immigration
reform had truly
been a priority
for Obama then
he might have
spent some time
working on it
during his first
two years in
office when his
party controlled
both houses of
Congress. The
fact he didn’t
lift a finger on
this issue until
the Republican
victory last
November made
passage of
reform an
impossibility
makes it hard
for even the
most partisan of
Hispanic
Democrats to
take Obama at
face value on
immigration.
Second, even
the president’s
current efforts
are completely
for show rather
than a genuine
attempt to pass
a bill. The
White House has
made no effort
to reach out to
Congress to pave
the way for
legislation, a
sure tipoff that
nothing serious
is planned.
Even more
damaging, as far
as Hispanic
Democrats are
concerned, is
the president’s
point-blank
refusal to use
his executive
power to halt
deportations of
undocumented
immigrants,
especially those
students who
might have
benefitted from
the Dream Act,
the bill to
legalize
students and
military
personnel who
were brought to
the United
States by their
parents. The
proposed Dream
Act Bill failed
in the Congress
last year.
The reasoning
for his refusal
is similarly
political. Obama
knows while
speeches about
amnesty might
help him among
Hispanics, they
won’t do him
much harm with
other groups
that might vote
for him. If he
used his
executive power
to erode the
government’s
efforts to
deport
undocumented,
however, the
chances are he
would undermine
his standing
with
independents.
So while the
national press
corps dutifully
followed Obama
to Texas to
assist his
efforts to
embarrass
Republicans, the
sector of the
population least
impressed with
him on this
issue is
Mexican American Hispanics. While
Republicans have
harmed
themselves with
these voters by
allowing
demagogues to be
the loudest
voices heard on
immigration,
most Hispanics
know it was
George W. Bush
who made
immigration
reform a
priority in his
second term, but
failed to get a
bill passed in
no small measure
because
Democrats and
liberals refused
to help him get
around members
of his own
party.
Hispanics
also know more
deportations
have taken place
in Obama’s two
years in office
than occurred
during the Bush
presidency.
Barack Obama
is right when he
says America
needs
immigration
reform, but he’s
wrong if he
thinks his
attempt to use
this issue for
political
advantage will
convince anyone
of his
sincerity.
President Obama, who has spent two
and a half years not delivering on his
promise to fix immigration in the speech
given with great fanfare in El Paso last
month cloaked his failure in tough
statistics — this many new border
agents, that much fencing, these
thousands of deportations.
As for the other parts of reform —
where millions of immigrants get right
with the law and get on with becoming
Americans, where workers are better
protected — he threw up his hands. He
said to immigration advocates, “Wish I could
just bypass Congress and change the law
myself. But that’s not how a democracy
works.”
There is a lot however President
Obama can and should do, using the
discretion and authority granted to the
executive branch and its agencies to
make the system work better:
●
Mr. Obama can bolster public safety by pulling
the plug on Secure Communities, a
program that sends fingerprints of
everyone booked by state or local police
to Department of Homeland Security
databases to be checked for immigration
violations. It was supposed to focus on
dangerous felons, but the heavy majority
of those it catches are non-criminals or
minor offenders — more than 30 percent
have no convictions for anything.
The president should listen to the
many law enforcement professionals and
local officials, like the governors of
New York and Illinois, who want nothing
to do with Secure Communities. They say
it endangers the public by catching the
wrong people and stifling community
cooperation with law enforcement.
●
The president can push much harder against the
noxious anti-immigrant laws
proliferating in the national
free-for-all. The administration sued to
stop Arizona’s radical scheme but Utah,
Alabama, Indiana and Georgia are trying
to do the same thing.
●
He can grant relief from deportation to young
people who would have qualified for the
Dream Act, a bill that congress refused
to pass that would have granted legal
status to the innocent undocumented who
enter college or the military. He can do
the same for workers who would qualify
for the Power Act, a stalled bill that
seeks to prevent employers from using
the threat of deportation and
immigration raids to retaliate against
employees who press for their rights on
the job.
●
He can resist Republican lawmakers who want
mandatory nationwide use of E-Verify, a
flawed hiring database, which would
likely lead to thousands of Americans
losing their job because of data errors.
A December report by the Government
Accountability Office warned E-Verify is
plagued by inaccurate records and
vulnerable to identity theft and
employer fraud.
●
He can order the citizenship agency to keep
families intact by making it easier for
undocumented immigrants who are
immediate relatives of American citizens
to fix their status without having to
leave the country. Many already qualify
for green cards but are afraid to risk
getting stuck abroad under too-strict
laws that could bar their re-entry.
●
He can bolster the civil rights division of the
Department of Justice and give the
Department of Labor more tools to
strengthen protections for all workers
and the authority to combat labor
trafficking. Such authority now lies
with Homeland Security, which means many
immigrants are too frightened to speak
up when their rights are abused.
As President Obama said in El Paso,
the United States needs to address “the
real human toll of a broken immigration
system.” There’s work to do, Mr.
President and your actions demonstrate
the lack of empathy for Hispanics torn
apart by deporting family members for
having a broken tail light or jay
walking.
Obama can not Win without the Mexican
American
Vote
The failure of all the above to help
Hispanics will be devastating in 2012 when
Mexican Americans fail to vote for Obama.
The alternative is a Republican win but
the truth is Hispanics were better off with
President Bush.
The only way to move Hispanics forward is
to vote for American Hispanics to replace
non Hispanics members of Congress and
especially to elect an Mexican American
Hispanic to the Senate to become America's
advocate for Immigration Reform.
As for Obama's strategy to win a second
term, Democrats evaluating the 2012 map are
confident President Barack Obama can win
enough battleground states to earn a second
term, but via a far less aggressive path
than what he forged in 2008.
Party strategists, Obama aides and top
Democrats see multiple routes for the
president to reach the 270 Electoral College
votes he needs on Nov. 6, 2012. But some
Democrats splash cold water on the big talk
of outreach in all 50 states, saying it is
obvious the president will focus on
traditional swing territory.
A Democratic official familiar with the
still-forming re-election campaign told Roll
Call the focus will be holding the 2008
pickups of Colorado, Virginia and North
Carolina, winning over Hispanic voters in
the West and flooding the traditional swing
states of Ohio and Florida with resources.
The Democrats feel good about winning New
Mexico and Nevada, especially given the
population growth among Hispanics.
Obviously the Obama re-election strategy
falls flat without Hispanic voters voting
for Obama.
What follows is a strategy the Obama
re-election team will implement assuming the
Hispanic vote will turn out for Obama but we,
Hispanics, know this is a false assumption
unless Obama accepts the
conditions/requirements stated below.
While it’s early and strategies will
surely evolve based on who becomes the GOP
nominee, there are several paths for the
president to win re-election.
As the campaign shapes up, this map
translates into frequent Obama trips to the
heartland and western battlegrounds and
maintaining popularity with the black voters
who can help Obama win Virginia and North
Carolina a second time. It means the
president must keep Hispanic voters
interested in the election to help him lock
down Nevada, New Mexico and Colorado.
Where Hispanic Votes Will Matter in 2012
With the recent release of the national Census data pundits have been
quick to point out the obvious: the Hispanic population is growing!
As if data points from the annual
Current Population Survey, and now American Community Survey did not already
tell us this on a yearly basis, the official 2010 decennial census now confirms
that more than 50.5 million Hispanics are part of America and politicians should
take note.
However, the lingering question on
journalists' minds is whether or not this population growth will transfer into
immediate political power?
With 33 U.S. Senate contests and a
Presidential election across 50 states in 2012, the Hispanic voter is positioned
to have a bigger impact than ever on the political landscape of America. However, even as the citizen eligible population is increasing rapidly,
Hispanics
continue to face a registration gap vis-a-vis Whites and African Americans.
Despite massive voter registration
drives in 2008 and 2010, only about 60% of Hispanic citizen adults are registered
to vote, compared to 70% of Blacks, and 74% of Whites. Thus, while the Hispanic
population is growing dramatically (43% growth since 2000, compared to 1% growth
in the White population), it's influence in 2012 could be even greater than
expected if voter registration drives take shape.
Using data from the 1996 - 2008 Current Population Survey, Voting and
Registration supplement, and 2010 Census data where available, we have projected
the Hispanic eligible voter population, by state for November 2012.
Given the trends in growth rates over
the previous decade, and new data from 2010, we project linear estimates for
each state in 2012. By the 2012 election, Hispanics will account for over 10% of
the citizen adult population - potential voters - in 11 states.
In another 13 states, Hispanic account for
5-10% of the citizen adult population. All told, that's 24 states where
Hispanics
have the capacity to influence electoral outcomes, given a competitive statewide
election. In the table below, we outline the potential states where Hispanics
votes might matter in elections for U.S. Senate and President in 2012.
For each state, we list the percentage
of the total citizen adult eligible population that is Hispanic, as well as an
estimate of how many eligible Hispanics are not yet registered to vote. States are
sorted by where Hispanics are likely to have the most influence in 2012.
In 2012, Hispanic voters have the best chance to influence outcomes in 10 states
for either Senate, President, or both. Four of the top five states will be
"Hispanic influence states" on everyone's map: New Mexico, Florida, Nevada,
Colorado all have large and growing Hispanic electorates in otherwise politically
competitive states.
In addition to close presidential
contests, New Mexico, Florida and Nevada will likely see very competitive Senate
elections. Another state we include, Arizona, has a large Hispanic population, and
depending on who the nominees are for U.S. Senate, could have a fairly
competitive election with Hispanic voters proving decisive. In 2010, Hispanics
registered voters in Arizona demonstrated the highest turnout rate of Hispanics in
any state.
The next batch of states Hispanics may influence are ones that historically
are not obvious Hispanic states, but significant population growth over the last
decade has left a substantial Hispanic eligible voter population.
In Connecticut, Georgia, Pennsylvania,
Wisconsin and Massachusetts, Hispanics account for over 5% of potential voters,
and each state is expected have a competitive U.S. Senate or Presidential
contest in 2012. For example, in Georgia, the Hispanic population grew by 96%
since 2000 while the White population grew by 6%; a state McCain won by just 5%
(52-47) in 2008. In Wisconsin Hispanics grew by 74% compared to 1% growth for
Whites, and could be one of the most fiercely contested states in 2012.
Beyond these 10 states, there are others where Hispanics will matter if elections
are close, as expected in Nebraska, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri and Ohio. While
the Hispanic population is a smaller percentage, the number of Hispanic citizen
adults is growing rapidly, and with voter registration drives targeting
potential Hispanic voters, we could very well be talking about the next "Hispanic
upset" ala Reid vs. Angle in one of these five states. In Missouri the
Hispanic
population grew by 79% - 20 times faster than the White population (which grew
by 4%), in a state that McCain won by just 4,000 total votes in 2008. One of the
biggest keys to Hispanic influence in 2012 will not just be the population growth
which has already occurred, but rather, voter registration drives that still
need to occur.
Over 8 million more to be registered
Overall, we estimate 21.5 million
Hispanic
citizen adults will be eligible to vote in November 2012, up from 19.5 million
in 2008. If registration rates remain constant, that will leave over 8 million
Hispanic eligible voters who are not registered in 2012. With significant voter
registration drives the Hispanic vote can go from influential to essential. In
addition to the current Hispanic share of the citizen adult population in each
state in the table above, we've also listed the estimated number of Hispanics
eligible to vote who are not registered, given growth rates. For example, while
Hispanics are growing in influence in Arizona, there are over 400,000 Hispanics
eligible to vote who are not yet registered. In Florida it's even more - over
600,000 Hispanics could be added to the voter rolls. Newly naturalized citizens
and young Hispanics turning 18 are adding literally a half-million of new
potential voters each year.
Over the past decade, and well before, Hispanic civic and political organizations
have led the charge in registering voters, as political parties rarely ventured
into el barrio for campaign outreach. Groups such as NALEO, NCLR, Southwest
Voter have invested millions of dollars and millions of hours into Hispanic voter
registration and civic education drives. Today, many new and influential groups
have emerged and done considerable work in Hispanic voter registration and
mobilization including Mi Familia Vota, Democracia USA, The Hispanic Institute,
and Voto Hispanic among many other groups. However, these non-partisan groups
operate mostly on soft money contributions and an extensive volunteer network.
A significant investment in Hispanic voter
registration is badly overdue by both major political parties. In Texas, for
example, there are an estimated 2.1 million Hispanic eligible voters who are not
yet registered, who could be crucial to either party's desire to win and hold
statewide office in Texas in coming years. In California there are another 2
million eligible Hispanics to be registered. There are 300,000 unregistered
Hispanics who could be voters in Illinois where a U.S. Senate election was decided
by less than 60,000 votes in 2010.
As pundits look towards 2012, Hispanic voters are positioned to cast crucial votes
in many states. Beyond looking at just the likely 4/4 voters, or perhaps the
pool of registered voters, campaigns and candidates would be wise to look at the
growing pool of Hispanic eligible voters and invest now in bringing more
Hispanics
into the political system - an investment that will pay off for decades to come.
Obama is
headed for a rude awaking
“The President obviously sees his visit to Puerto Rico as part of a larger
Hispanic voter outreach strategy for 2012, but one of the most important,
concrete steps he can take to show Hispanic voters he is on their side is to
stop deporting DREAM Act students,” said Gutierrez. “Right away. Today.”
“Hispanics who turn out in November 2012 are going to vote two to one for
Obama,” said Louis Desipio, a professor of political science and Chicano and
Latino studies at the University of California, Irvine. “Obama can take the
Hispanic vote for granted in some sense, but he shouldn’t take turnout for
granted.”
Desipio said Hispanics will vote in higher numbers in 2012 because of
simple demographic shifts, but that it’s unclear whether Obama can or will
really leverage the full capacity of the Hispanic community.
“If Hispanics are frustrated in 2012 as they tentatively are now regarding the
non-movement on immigration, that might mean a lower increase in turnout. What
he needs to do is energize Hispanic communities to turn out.”
This year Obama’s overtures to Hispanic communities have been a series of
speeches and White House gatherings around immigration. Back in May, Obama
headed to El Paso, Texas, to give a speech on the need for immigration reform.
It left many immigration reform watchers perplexed and disappointed. That speech was preceded by
a series of White House meetings on immigration in April, one with Hispanic
celebrities like Eva Longoria and America Ferrera and another with what the
White House called “immigration stakeholders.”
All for show
because absent from the meeting
were representatives from actual immigrant communities or those who advocate for
immigration reform. The White House chose to invite a handful of mayors and
governors and executives from Cargill, Facebook and JP Morgan Chase instead.
“While we appreciate the President’s effort to keep immigration reform on the
national agenda, his actions belie his intent,” Pablo Alvarado, director of the
National Day Laborer Organizing Network said at the time. “If the President
genuinely wanted to fix the broken immigration system, he would respond to the
growing chorus of voices calling for the suspension of the Secure Communities
program and move to legalize instead of further criminalize our immigrant
communities.”
All immigrant rights advocates agree.
“As of right now, Obama’s speeches are all we have. We have not seen results
yet,” said Ben Monterroso, the executive director of Mi Familia Vota, a Hispanic
voter outreach group. “But, from the other side all we have is attacks, which
are more hurtful than anything else.”
“I don’t know if the community is going to just back up Obama just because we
don’t have a better alternative,” Monterroso added. “I think our community is
smarter than that.”
Content from:
"Where Latino Votes Will Matter in 2012"
by Matt Barreto
of Latino
Decisions;
"Immigration Is the Top Issue Driving the Latino Vote" by Matt Barreto
of Latino Decisions and Mónica Lozano, ImpreMedia; and
"Only Immigration Reform will End SB1070" by Jon Garrido, The Jon Garrido Network.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|